4.5 Article

Nitrogen-Rich Carbon Nitride Hollow Vessels: Synthesis, Characterization, and Their Properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 114, 期 29, 页码 9429-9434

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp103729c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20070183175]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [50772043]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2005CB724400, 2001C13711201]
  4. Research Startup Foundation of Jilin University [419080103460]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bulk quantities of nitrogen-rich graphitic carbon nitride are synthesized via a facile reactive pyrolysis process with a mixture of melamine and cyanuric chloride as the molecular precursors. Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy studies show that micrometer-sized hollow vessels with high aspect ratios have been successfully elaborated without the designed addition of any catalyst or template. The composition of the prepared carbon nitride determined by combustion method is C3N4.9H1.00O0.22, with the N/C ratio to be 1.64, indicating a high nitrogen content. X-ray diffraction pattern reveals the regular stacking of graphene CNA. monolayers along the (002) direction with the presence of turbostratic ordering of C and N atoms in the a-b basal planes. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy investigations provide further evidence for graphite-like sp(2)-bonded building blocks based on both triazine and heptazine ring units bridged by 3-fold coordinated nitrogen atoms. The optical properties of the sample are investigated by UV-vis absorption and photoluminescence spectroscopy, which show features characteristic of pi-pi* and n-pi* electronic transitions involving lone pairs of nitrogen atoms. Thermogravimetric analysis curves of the synthesized graphitic carbon nitride hollow vessels show typical weight loss steps related to the volatilization of triazine and heptazine structural units.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据