4.5 Article

Application of the Compensated Arrhenius Formalism to Self-Diffusion: Implications for Ionic Conductivity and Dielectric Relaxation

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 114, 期 26, 页码 8600-8605

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp1020142

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [0639199]
  2. Oklahoma/Arkansas MRSEC [DMR-0520550]
  3. Division Of Chemistry
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0639199] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-diffusion coefficients are measured from -5 to 80 degrees C in a series of linear alcohols using pulsed field gradient NMR. The temperature dependence of these data is studied using a compensated Arrhenius formalism that assumes an Arrhenius-like expression for the diffusion coefficient; however, this expression includes a dielectric constant dependence in the exponential prefactor. Scaling temperature-dependent diffusion coefficients to isothermal diffusion coefficients so that the exponential prefactors cancel results in calculated energies of activation E-a. The exponential prefactor is determined by dividing the temperature-dependent diffusion coefficients by the Boltzmann term exp(-E-a/RT). Plotting the prefactors versus the dielectric constant places the data on a single master curve. This procedure is identical to that previously used to study the temperature dependence of ionic conductivities and dielectric relaxation rate constants. The energies of activation determined from self-diffusion coefficients in the series of alcohols are strikingly similar to those calculated for the same series of alcohols from both dielectric relaxation rate constants and ionic conductivities of dilute electrolytes. The experimental results are described in terms of an activated transport mechanism that is mediated by relaxation of the solution molecules. This microscopic picture of transport is postulated to be common to diffusion, dielectric relaxation, and ionic transport.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据