4.5 Article

Electron Dynamics in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Effects of Surface Terminations and Defects

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 114, 期 51, 页码 17077-17083

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp108590f

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [DMR-0611562, DMR-0958596]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1035480] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Division Of Materials Research [1035480] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electron dynamics in a TiO2/alizarin based dye-sensitized solar cell is studied by a means of ab initio nonadiabatic molecular dynamics. The effects of surface terminations and vacancy defects on photoexcited interfacial electron transfer (ET) and energy relaxation of injected electrons are examined in detail. In particular, we consider three plausible TiO2 surface terminations which are stable at zero temperature. However, only one of them maintains structural integrity at room temperature while the other two terminations lead to broken interfacial Ti-O bonds. An ultrafast ET dynamics (4.6 fs) is observed for the intact interface, consistent with relevant experimental and theoretical results. On the other hand, the ET dynamics of the two other terminations takes either a much longer time or results in less charge transfer. The surface vacancies in TiO2 are found to play important roles in the structural integrity, the interfacial ET dynamics, and the energy relaxation in the TiO2 conduction bands. For example, O vacancies are observed to enhance the interfacial bonding, delocalize the photoexcited state, and facilitate nonadiabatic ET. On the other hand, Ti vacancies give rise to less stable interfacial structure and negligible ET. The energy relaxation time scale for the injected electron in the conduction band is 500 fs regardless of the vacancies. Both O and Ti surface vacancies are found to trap the injected electron while the O vacancies could increase the charge recombination at the interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据