4.5 Article

Inhibition of Natural Gas Hydrates in the Presence of Liquid Hydrocarbons Forming Structure H

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 114, 期 18, 页码 6084-6088

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp910941d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korea National Oil Corporation
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [2007-M-CC22-P-02-0-000] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. Korea Institute of Industrial Technology(KITECH) [2007-M-CC22-P-02] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of LMGS (large molecule guest substance) amount on the thermodynamics of natural gas hydrates, as well as structural characteristics of mixed hydrates of LMGS and natural gas, have been studied. The addition of 1.7 wt % neohexane (NH) to water induced inhibition of natural gas hydrates, and this inhibition effect increased with increased addition of NH up to 7.8 wt %. However, the hydrate equilibrium condition changed slightly when the concentration of NH further increased from 7.8 to 14.5 wt %. Investigations on structural characteristics were carried out by analyzing C-13 NMR spectra of mixed hydrates formed from the mixture of natural gas and NI-I. They indicate that two hydrate structures of II and I-I coexist simultaneously, and the ratio of structure H to II decreased from 0.97 to 0.43 when the NH concentration decreased from 14.5 to 7.8 wt %. In addition, it was confirmed that ethane, propane, and iso-butane gas molecules do not participate in the formation of structure H and only enclathrated in large cages of structure II. These results indicate the existence of multiple hydrate structures, which must he considered in many industrial applications when mixed hydrates are formed from multicomponent gas mixtures and liquid hydrocarbons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据