4.5 Article

Computational Modeling of Carbohydrate-Recognition Process in E-Selectin Complex: Structural Mapping of Sialyl Lewis X onto Ab Initio QM/MM Free Energy Surface

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 114, 期 11, 页码 3950-3964

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp905872t

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To advance our knowledge of carbohydrate recognition by lectins, we propose a systematic computational modeling strategy to identify complex sugar-chain conformations oil the reduced free energy surface (FES). We selected the complex of E-selectin with sialyl Lewis X (denoted E-selectin/SLe(x) complex) as a first target molecule. First, we introduced the reduced 2D-FES that characterizes conformational changes in carbohydrate structure as well as the degree of solvation stability of the carbohydrate ligand, and evaluated the overall free energy profile by classical molecular dynamics simulation combined with ab initio QM/MM energy corrections. Second, we mapped flexible carbohydrate structures onto the reduced QM/MM 2D-FES, and identified the details of molecular interactions between each monosaccharide component and the amino acid residues at the carbohydrate-recognition domain. Finally, we confirmed the validity of our modeling strategy by evaluating the chemical shielding tensor by ab initio QM/MM-GIAO computations for several QM/MM-refined geometries sampled from the minimum free energy region in the 2D-FES, and compared this theoretical averaging data with the experimental 1D-NMR profile. The model clearly shows that the binding geometries of the E-selectin/SLe(x) complex are determined not by one single, rigid carbohydrate structure but rather by the sum of averaged conformations fluctuating around the minimum free energy region. For the E-selectin/SLe(x) complex, the major molecular interactions are hydrogen bonds between Fuc and the Ca(2+) binding site in the carbohydrate-recognition domain, and Gal is important in determining the ligand specificity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据