4.5 Article

Effects of Temperature and pH on the Contraction and Aggregation of Microgels in Aqueous Suspensions

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 113, 期 32, 页码 11115-11123

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp901121g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council [177665/V30]
  2. VISTA/Statoil [6338]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemically cross-linked poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) microgels and PNIPAM with different amounts of acrylic acid groups (PNIPAM-co-PAA) were synthesized and the temperature-induced aggregation behaviors of aqueous suspensions of these microgels were investigated mainly with the aid of dynamic light scattering (DLS) and turbidimetry. The DLS results show that the particles at all conditions shrink at temperatures up to approximately the lower critical solution temperature (LCST), but the relative contraction effect is larger for the microgels without acid groups or for microgels with added anionic surfactant (SDS). A significant depression of the cloud point is found in suspensions of PNIPAM with very low concentrations of SDS. The compression of the microgels cannot be traced from the turbidity results, but rather the values of the turbidity increase in this temperature interval. This phenomenon is discussed in the framework of a theoretical model. At temperatures above LCST, the size of the microgels without attached charged groups in a very dilute suspension is unaffected by temperature, while the charged particles (pH 7 and 11) continue to collapse with increasing temperature over the entire domain. In this temperature range, low-charged particles of higher concentration and particles containing acrylic acid groups at low pH (pH 2) aggregate, and macroscopic phase separation is approached at higher temperatures. This study demonstrates how the stabilization of microgels can be affected by factors such as polymer concentration, addition of ionic surfactant to particles without charged acid groups, amount of charged groups in the polymer, and pH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据