4.5 Article

Molecular Insight into Adsorption and Diffusion of Alkane Isomer Mixtures in Metal-Organic Frameworks

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 113, 期 27, 页码 9129-9136

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp902253p

关键词

-

资金

  1. National University of Singapore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adsorption and diffusion of alkane isomer Mixtures (C-4 and C-5) are investigated in catenated and noncatenated metal-organic frameworks (IRMOF-13, IRMOF-14, PCN-6, and PCN-6') using molecular simulations. Competitive adsorption between isomers is observed, particularly at high pressures, at which a linear isomer shows a larger extent of adsorption due to configurational entropy. An inflection is found in the isotherm as a consequence of sequential adsorption ill multiple favorable sites. Compared with the noncatenated counterparts, IRMOF-13 and PCN-6 have a greater loading at low pressures because of the constricted pores and stronger affinity with adsorbate. However, the reverse is true at high pressures due to the smaller pore Volume. Catenated MOFs exhibit larger adsorption selectivity for alkane mixtures than the noncatenated counterparts. Adsorption selectivity ill the four MOFs is comparable to that in carbon nanotube and silicalite, though adsorption capacity is lower in the latter. It is found that diffusivity of alkane in MOFs decreases with the degree of branching because a slender isomer diffuses faster. With the presence of constricted pores, diffusivity in catenated MOFs is smaller than that in noncatenated counterparts. In IRMOF-14 and IRMOF-13 diffusivity decreases monotonically, while it initially increases and then decreases in PCN-6'. The diffusion selectivity in catenated IRMOF-13 and PCN-6 is larger than that in noncatenated IRMOF-14 and PCN-6'. This work provides insightful microscopic mechanisms for the adsorption and diffusion of alkane isomers ill MOFs and reveals that both adsorption and diffusion selectivities call be enhanced by catenation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据