4.7 Article

Dynamical mass ejection from black hole-neutron star binaries

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 92, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.044028

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [PHY-0923409, PHY-1104371]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [24244028, 26247042, 26287051, 26400267, 24000004]
  3. MEXT KAKENHI [24103006]
  4. JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research Abroad
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26287051, 26400267, 24103006, 26247042] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate properties of material ejected dynamically in the merger of black hole-neutron star binaries by numerical-relativity simulations. We systematically study the dependence of ejecta properties on the mass ratio of the binary, spin of the black hole, and equation of state of the neutron-star matter. Dynamical mass ejection is driven primarily by tidal torque, and the ejecta is much more anisotropic than that from binary neutron star mergers. In particular, the dynamical ejecta is concentrated around the orbital plane with a half opening angle of 10 degrees-20 degrees and often sweeps out only a half of the plane. The ejecta mass can be as large as similar to 0.1M(circle dot), and the velocity is subrelativistic with similar to 0.2-0.3c for typical cases. The ratio of the ejecta mass to the bound mass (disk and fallback components) is larger, and the ejecta velocity is larger, for larger values of the binary mass ratio, i.e., for larger values of the black-hole mass. The remnant black hole-disk system receives a kick velocity of O(100) km s(-1) due to the ejecta linear momentum, and this easily dominates the kick velocity due to gravitational radiation. Structures of postmerger material, velocity distribution of the dynamical ejecta, fallback rates, and gravitational waves are also investigated. We also discuss the effect of ejecta anisotropy on electromagnetic counterparts, specifically a macronova/kilonova and synchrotron radio emission, developing analytic models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据