4.5 Article

Born-Oppenheimer ab Initio QM/MM Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Hydrolysis Reaction Catalyzed by Protein Arginine Deiminase 4

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 113, 期 52, 页码 16705-16710

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp9080614

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01-GM079223]
  2. NSF [CHE-CAREER-0448156]
  3. China Scholarship Council
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20725312, 20533060]
  5. Ministry of Science and Technology [2007CB815201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein arginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) catalyzes the citrullination of the peptidylarginine via two successive stages: deimination and hydrolysis. Herein, by employing state-of-the-art Born-Oppenheimer ab initio QM/MM molecular dynamics simulations with the umbrella sampling method, we characterized the catalytic mechanism of the hydrolysis reaction: first, the nucleophilic attack of a water molecule to the C-zeta of the thiouronium intermediate yields a stable tetrahedral intermediate, and then the S-C-zeta bond breaks to generate the final product, citrulline. Throughout the hydrolysis reaction, His471 and Asp473 play pivotal catalytic roles by first enhancing the nucleophilic ability of the active water through forming shorter and low-barrier hydrogen bonds and then by serving as proton-accepting groups to deprotonate the water molecule, which is consistent with experimental findings. At the transition state, the spontaneous proton transfer among the reactive water, His471 and Asp473 have been observed. The determined overall free energy barrier for this hydrolysis stage is 16.5 kcal.mol(-1), which is lower than the barrier of 20.9 kcal.mol(-1) for the deimination stage determined previously with the same computational approach [J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 12750-12758]. Thus, the rate-determining step of the PAD4-catalyzed citrullination is the first step of the deimination. Our current work further demonstrates the strength and applicability of the ab initio QM/MM MD approach in simulating enzyme reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据