4.5 Article

Passive transport of C60 fullerenes through a lipid membrane:: A molecular dynamics simulation study

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 112, 期 7, 页码 2078-2084

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp075149c

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the implications of the unique properties of fullerenes on their interaction with and passive transport into lipid membranes, atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of a C-60 fullerene in a fully hydrated di-myristoyl-phoshatidylcholine lipid membrane have been carried out. In these simulations the free energy and the diffusivity of the fullerene were obtained as a function of its position within the membrane. These properties were utilized to calculate the permeability of fullerenes through the lipid membrane. Simulations reveal that the free energy decreases as the fullerene passes from the aqueous phase, through the head group layer and into the hydrophobic core of the membrane. This decrease in free energy is not due to hydrophobic interactions but rather to stronger van der Waals (dispersion) interactions between the fullerene and the membrane compared to those between the fullerene and (bulk) water. It was found that there is no free energy barrier for transport of a fullerene from the aqueous phase into the lipid core of the membrane. In combination with strong partitioning of the fullerenes into the lipidic core of the membrane, this barrierless penetration results in an astonishingly large permeability of fullerenes through the lipid membrane, greater than observed for any other known penetrant. When the strength of the dispersion interactions between the fullerene and its surroundings is reduced in the simulations, thereby emulating a nanometer sized hydrophobic particle, a large free energy barrier for penetration of the head group layer emerges, indicating that the large permeability of fullerenes through lipid membranes is a result of their unique interaction with their surrounding medium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据