4.6 Article

Electrostatically Embedded Generalized Molecular Fractionation with Conjugate Caps Method for Full Quantum Mechanical Calculation of Protein Energy

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 117, 期 32, 页码 7149-7161

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp400779t

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10974054, 20933002]
  2. Shanghai PuJiang program [09PJ1404000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An electrostatically embedded generalized molecular fractionation with conjugate caps (EE-GMFCC) method is developed for efficient linear-scaling quantum mechanical (QM) calculation of protein energy. This approach is based on our previously proposed GMFCC/MM method (He; et al. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 184703), In this EE-GMFCC scheme, the total energy of protein is calculated by taking a linear combination of the QM energy of the neighboring residues and the two-body QM interaction energy between non-neighboring residues that are spatially in close contact. All the fragment calculations are embedded in a field of point charges representing the remaining protein environment, which is the major improvement over our previous GMFCC/MM approach. Numerical studies are carried out to calculate the total energies of 18 real three-dimensional proteins of up to 1142 atoms using the EE-GMFCC approach at the HF/6-31G* level. The overall mean unsigned error of EE-GMFCC for the 18 proteins is 2.39 kcal/mol with reference to the full system HF/6-31G* energies. The EE-GMFCC approach is also applied for proteins at the levels of the density functional theory (DFT) and second-order many-body perturbation theory (MP2), also showing only a few kcal/mol deviation from the corresponding full system result. The EE-GMFCC method is linear-scaling with a low prefactor, trivially parallel, and can be readily applied to routinely perform structural optimization of proteins and molecular dynamics simulation with high level ab initio electronic structure theories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据