4.6 Article

Understanding the Magnetic Anisotropy in a Family of N23- Radical-Bridged Lanthanide Complexes: Density Functional Theory and ab Initio Calculations

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 117, 期 42, 页码 10873-10880

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp4044495

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10704041, 90922033, 21071008]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB933401, 2010CB934601]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK2011778]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M520104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Density functional theory (DFT) and ab initio methods were used to investigate the influence of both intramolecular exchange coupling and single-ion anisotropy on the relaxation barriers of a series of N-2(3-) radical-bridged lanthanide complexes [{[(Me3Si)(2)N](2)(THF)Ln}(2)(mu-eta(2):eta(2)-N-2)](-) (Ln = Gd-III (1), Tb-III (2), Dy-III (3), Ho-III (4), and Er-III (5)) reported by Long and co-workers. DFT calculations show that the exchange coupling between the lanthanide ions is very weak, but the Ln-N-2(3-) coupling is strong for each complex. Moreover, the exchange couplings of Ln-N-2(3-) are antiferromagnetic for Ln = Gd-III, Tb-III, Dy-III, and Ho-III but ferromagnetic for Er-III for the nearly orthogonal magnetic orbitals on Er-III and N-2(3-). Ab initio calculations show that both of the large magnetic anisotropy of single Tb fragment and the strong Tb-N-2(3-) antiferromagnetic couplings lead to the largest energy barrier of complex 2. Although the energy barrier of a single Er fragment is the second largest, the relaxation barrier of complex 5 is only 36.0 cm(-1) due to the weak Er-III-N-2(3-) coupling. This study suggests that both intramolecular exchange coupling and single-ion anisotropy contribute greatly to the full relaxation barrier of lanthanide-based single-molecule magnets (SMMs), which expands the understanding of SMMs using only the giant-spin model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据