4.6 Article

Collision-Induced Dissociation of Halide Ion-Arginine Complexes: Evidence for Anion-Induced Zwitterion Formation in Gas-Phase Arginine

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 116, 期 2, 页码 801-809

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp208183p

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [208589-BIOIONS]
  2. Science City York
  3. Northern Way Initiative
  4. Nuffield Undergraduate Research Bursary
  5. EPSRC UK National Service for Computational Chemistry Software (NSCCS) at Imperial College London [CHEM 459]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the first low-energy collisional-induced dissociation studies of the X-center dot arginine (X- = F-, Cl-, Br-, I-, NO3-, ClO3-) series of clusters to investigate the novel phenomenom of anion-induced zwitterion formation in a gas-phase amino acid. Fragmentation of the small halide ion clusters (F-center dot arginine and Cl-center dot arginine) is dominated by deprotonation of the arginine, whereas the major fragmentation channel for the largest ion clusters (I-center dot arginine and ClO3-center dot arginine) corresponds to simple cluster fission into the ion and neutral molecule. However, the fragmentation profiles of Br-center dot arginine and NO3-center dot arginine, display distinctive features that are consistent with the presence of the zwitterionic form of the amino acid in these clusters. The various dissociation pathways have been studied as a function of % collision energy and are discussed in comparison to the fragmentation profiles of protonated and deprotonated arginine. Electronic structure calculations are presented for Br-center dot arginine to support the presence of the zwitterionic amino acid in this complex. The results obtained in this work provide important information on the low-energy potential energy surfaces of these anion amino acid clusters and reveal the presence of several overlapping surfaces in the low-energy region for the Br-center dot arginine and NO3-center dot arginine systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据