4.6 Article

Theoretical Approaches To Estimating Homolytic Bond Dissociation Energies of Organocopper and Organosilver Compounds

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 116, 期 35, 页码 8910-8917

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp305718z

关键词

-

资金

  1. ARC [DP110103844]
  2. ARC CoE program
  3. Faculty of Science for a Science Faculty Scholarship
  4. Albert Shimmins Postgraduate Writing-Up Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although organocopper and organosilver compounds are known to decompose by homolytic pathways among others, surprisingly little is known about their bond dissociation energies (BDEs). In order to address this deficiency, the performance of the DFT functionals BLYP, B3LYP, BP86, TPSSTPSS, BHandHLYP, MO6L, M06, M06-2X, B97D, and PBEPBE, along with the double hybrids, mPW2-PLYP, B2-PLYP, and the ab initio methods, MP2 and CCSD(T), have been benchmarked against the thermochemistry for the M-C homolytic BDEs (Do) of Cu-CH3 and Ag-CH3, derived from guided ion beam experiments and CBS limit calculations (D-0(Cu-CH3) = 223 kJ.mol(-1); D-0(Ag-CH3) = 169 kJ.mol(-1)). Of the tested methods, in terms of chemical accuracy, error margin, and computational expense, M06 and BLYP were found to perform best for homolytic dissociation of methylcopper and methylsilver, compared with the CBS limit gold standard. Thus the M06 functional was used to evaluate the M-C homolytic bond dissociation energies of Cu-R and Ag-R, R = Et, Pr, iPr, tBu, allyl, CH2Ph, and Ph. It was found that Do(Ag-R) was always lower (similar to 50 kJ.mol(-1)) than that of Do(Cu-R). The trends in BDE when changing the R ligand reflected the H-R bond energy trends for the alkyl ligands, while for R = allyl, CH2Ph, and Ph, some differences in bond energy trends arose. These trends in homolytic bond dissociation energy help rationalize the previously reported (Rijs, N. J.; O'Hair, R A. J. Organometallics 2010, 29, 2282-2291) fragmentation pathways of the organometallate anions, [CH3MR](-).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据