4.6 Article

Quasi-Classical Trajectory Study of the HO+CO → H+CO2 Reaction on a New ab Initio Based Potential Energy Surface

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 116, 期 21, 页码 5057-5067

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp302278r

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-05ER15694, DE-FG02-97ER14782]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21133006]
  3. Missouri Research Board
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-97ER14782] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report extensive quasi-classical trajectory calculations of the HO + CO -> H + CO, reaction on a newly developed potential energy surface based on a large number of UCCSD(T)-F12/AVTZ calculations. This complex forming reaction is known for its unusual kinetics and dynamics because of its unique potential energy surface, which is dominated by the HOCO wells flanked by an entrance channel bottleneck and a transition state leading to the H + CO2 products. It was found that the thermal rate coefficients are in reasonably good agreement with known experimental data in both low and high pressure limits. Excitation of the OH vibration is shown to enhance reactivity, due apparently to its promoting effect over the transition state between the HOCO intermediate and the H + CO2 product. On the other hand, neither CO vibrational excitation nor rotational excitation in either CO or OH has a significant effect on reactivity, in agreement with experiment. However, significant discrepancies have been found between theory and the available molecular beam experiments. For example, the calculated translational energy distribution of the products substantially underestimates the experiment. In addition, the forward bias in the differential cross section observed in the experiment was not reproduced theoretically. While the origin of the discrepancies is still not clear, it is argued that a quantum mechanical treatment of the dynamics might be needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据