4.6 Article

Structure and NMR Spectra of Some [2.2]Paracyclophanes. The Dilemma of [2.2]Paracyclophane Symmetry

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 115, 期 38, 页码 10638-10649

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp205693a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling of Warsaw University [G28-7]
  2. Norwegian Supercomputing Program [nn4654K]
  3. Innovative Economy Operational Programme Grants for Innovation
  4. Research Council of Norway [179568/V30, 177558/V00]
  5. National Science Council, Taipei

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Density functional theory (DFT) quantum chemical calculations of the structure and NMR parameters for highly strained hydrocarbon [2.2]paracyclophane 1 and its three derivatives are presented. The calculated NMR parameters are compared with the experimental ones. By least-squares fitting of the H-1 spectra, almost all J(HH) coupling constants could be obtained with high accuracy. Theoretical vicinal J(HH) couplings in the aliphatic bridges, calculated using different basis sets (6-311G(d,p), and Huz-IV) reproduce the experimental values with essentially the same root-mean-square (rms) error of about 1.3 Hz, regardless of the basis set used. These discrepancies could be in part due to a considerable impact of rovibrational effects on the observed J(HH) couplings, since the latter show a measurable dependence on temperature. Because of the lasting literature controversies concerning the symmetry of parent compound 1, D-2h versus D-2, a critical analysis of the relevant literature data is carried out. The symmetry issue is prone to confusion because, according to some literature claims, the two hypothetical enantiomeric D-2 structures of 1 could be separated by a very low energy barrier that would explain the occurrence of rovibrational effects on the observed vicinal J(HH) couplings. However, the D-2h symmetry of 1 with a flat energy minimum could also account for these effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据