4.6 Article

Analytical Potential Energy Surface and Kinetics of the NH3 + H → NH2 + H2 Hydrogen Abstraction and the Ammonia Inversion Reactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 114, 期 12, 页码 4455-4463

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp1001513

关键词

-

资金

  1. Junta de Extremadura, Spain [PR107A009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on accurate electronic structure calculations, a new analytical potential energy surface (PES) was fitted to simultaneous describe the hydrogen abstraction reaction from ammonia by a hydrogen atom, and the ammonia inversion. Using a wide spectrum of properties of the reactive system (equilibrium geometries, vibrational frequencies, and relative energies of the stationary points, topology of the reaction path,;, and points on the reaction swaths) as reference, the resulting analytical PES reproduces reasonably well the input ab initio information obtained at the CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ level, which represents a severe test for the new surface. As a first application, oil this analytical PES we perform an extensive kinetics study Using Variational transition-state theory with semiclassical transmission coefficients over a wide temperature range, 200-2000 K. For the hydrogen abstraction reaction, the forward rate constants reproduce the experimental measurements, while the reverse ones are slightly Underestimated. Another severe test of the new surface is the analysis of the kinetic isotope effects (KIEs). The KIEs between unsubstituted and all deuterated reactions agree with experiment in the common temperature range. For the ammonia inversion reaction, the splitting of the degenerate vibrational levels of the double well due to the tunneling contribution, which is very important in this reaction representing 93% of the reactivity at 200 K, Was calculated for the NH3 and ND3 species. The values found were 3.6 and 0.37 cm(-1), respectively, which although higher than experimental values, reproduce the experimental behavior on isotopic substitution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据