4.6 Article

Photophysics of the π,π* and n,π* States of Thymine: MS-CASPT2 Minimum-Energy Paths and CASSCF on-the-Fly Dynamics

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 113, 期 38, 页码 10211-10218

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp905303g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CTQ2005-04563, CTQ2008-06696]
  2. EPSRC UK [EP/F028296/1]
  3. FPU [AP2004-4774]
  4. EPSRC [EP/F02780X/1, EP/F028296/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F02780X/1, EP/F028296/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The photodynamics along the main decay paths of thymine after excitation to the lowest pi,pi* state have been studied with MS-CASPT2 calculations and semiclassical CASSCF dynamics calculations including a surface hopping algorithm. The static calculations show that there are two decay paths from the Franck-Condon structure that lead to a conical intersection with the ground state. The first path goes directly to the intersection, while the second one is indirect and involves a minimum of the pi,pi* state, a small barrier, and a crossing between the pi,pi* and n,pi* states. From the static calculations, both paths have similar slopes. The dynamics calculations along the indirect path show that, after the barrier, part of the trajectories are funneled to the intersection with the ground state, where they are efficiently quenched to the ground state. The remaining trajectories populate the n,pi* state. They are also quenched to the ground state in less than 1 ps, but the static calculations show that the decay rate of the n,pi* state is largely overestimated at the CASSCF level used for the dynamics, Overall, these results suggest that both direct and indirect paths contribute to the subpicosecond decay components found experimentally. The indirect path also provides a way for fast population of the n,pi* state, which will account for the experimental picosecond decay component,

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据