4.6 Article

Dynamic Polar Solvation Is Reported by Fluorescing 4-Aminophthalimide Faithfully Despite H-Bonding

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 113, 期 1, 页码 44-55

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp807605b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solvation dynamics of 4-aminophthalimide (4AP) in methanol is measured by broadband upconversion of the fluorescence band. The peak emission frequency (v) over tilde (t) is determined from 100 fs onward with 85 fs time resolution. Polar solvation based on simple continuum theory, including solute polarizability, describes the temporal shape of P(t) quantitatively. Extrapolation (v) over tilde (t -> 0) points to an initial emission frequency which agrees with the result from stationary spectroscopy in a nonpolar solvent. The extent (4300 cm(-1)) of the dynamic Stokes shift is largely due (50%) to H-bonding, however. The observations imply that H-bonds with 4AP adiabatically follow the dielectric relaxation of the methanol network. The stimulated emission band is also used to measure solvation dynamics. The evolving band is monitored by transient absorption spectroscopy of supercontinuum probe pulses. But the excited-state absorption spectrum, its relative amplitude, and its evolution are needed to extract (v) over tilde (t) from such measurements. These key data are obtained by comparison with the upconversion results. Thus calibrated photometrically, 4AP transient absorption can be used to monitor solvation dynamics in any solvent. The excited-state absorption spectrum is assigned with the help of time-dependent density-functional calculations. Fluorescence excitation and double-resonance spectroscopy of isolated 4AP, cooled in a supersonic jet, is used to determine optically active modes. An intramolecular reorganization energy is inferred which is consistent with the value in 2-methylbutane (2025 cm-(1)). The crystal structure is also provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据