4.6 Article

On the Origin of Small Band Gaps in Alternating Thiophene-Thienopyrazine Oligomers

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 113, 期 38, 页码 10343-10350

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp9050148

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chemical Sciences (CW) division of The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. Joint Solar Programme (JSP)
  3. Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM)
  4. Chemical Sciences of NWO
  5. Foundation Shell Research
  6. European Commission [MRTN-CT-2006-035884]
  7. Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS)
  8. Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have studied experimentally and theoretically the optical and electrochemical properties of small band gap oligo(7,7'-bis(thiophen-2-yl)-5,5'-bisthieno[3,4-b]pyrazine)s with alternating blocks of bithiophene units and bisthienopyrazine units up to a total length of 16 units. The optical absorptions of the ground state, the triplet excited state, and the corresponding radical cation have been identified and shift to lower energy with increasing chain length. The optical absorption correlates well with quantum chemical calculations and the electrochemical band gap. We show that reduction of the band gap with chain length results from a significant rise of the HOMO level and a moderate reduction of the LUMO energy. Comparison of the chain length dependence of the transition energy at maximum absorption (E-max) and of the redox potentials with previously published data on oligothiophenes and related mixed thiophene-thienopyrazine oligomers shows that the reduction of E-max is more easily induced by increasing the number of thienopyrazine units than by extending the chain, mainly because thienopyrazine is both a better donor and a better acceptor than thiophene. Strong interactions between neighboring thienopyrazine units, with some possible admixing of quinoid character, are the main cause of the small band gap in these oligomers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据