4.5 Article

REASSESSMENT OF THE CYANOBACTERIAL FAMILY MICROCHAETACEAE AND ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW FAMILIES TOLYPOTHRICHACEAE AND GODLEYACEAE

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
卷 50, 期 6, 页码 1089-1100

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12241

关键词

16S rRNA gene; Cyanobacteria; Godleyaceae; Microchaetaceae; Tolypothrichaceae; Tolypothrix; Fortiea; new species

资金

  1. Grant agency of the CR [P506/12/1818]
  2. Ministry of Education [MSMT/AMVIS LH12100]
  3. ESF [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0006]
  4. ECOP program [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0006]
  5. Academy of Sciences of the CR long-term research development project [RVO67985939]
  6. National Science Foundation [DEB-0842702]
  7. programme Projects of Large Infrastructure for Research, Development, and Innovations [LM2010005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The family Microchaetaceae is a large group of heterocytous cyanobacteria, whose members bear typical morphological features of uniseriate heteropolar filaments never terminated by thin hairs and with simple false branching. However, phylogenetic analyses of the gene for 16S rRNA showed that members of this traditionally morphologically delimited family form several distant groups and therefore the current concept is hereafter indefensible. In this study, we provide reassessment of the status of the family Microchaetaceae based on morphology, ecology, biogeography, and phylogeny of 16S rRNA gene. Thorough examination of strains of the nominate genus Microchaete revealed their affiliation to two groups, Nostocaceae and Rivulariaceae, and their distant position to other traditional members of Microchaetaceae such as Tolypothrix, Hassallia, and Coleodesmium. To reflect the phylogenetic relationships and to accommodate members of the traditional family Microchaetaceae that are clearly not related to any of the Microchaete representatives, we propose establishment of two new families, Tolypothrichaceae and Godleyaceae. Based on both molecular and morphological evidence, we also provide a description of three new species of the genus Fortiea.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据