4.5 Article

Species Diversity, Phylogeny and Large Scale Biogeographic Patterns of the Genus Padina (Phaeophyceae, Dictyotales)

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 130-142

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12027

关键词

biogeography; brown algae; Dictyotales; general mixed yule-coalescent model; molecular phylogeny; Padina; Phaeophyceae; species delineation

资金

  1. Ghent University
  2. Hercules Foundation
  3. Flemish Government - department EWI
  4. Consortium National de Recherche en Genomique
  5. Action Transversale du Museum (ATM) Barcode [2005/67]
  6. French Ministere de l'enseignement superieur et de la recherche
  7. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO) [G.0142.05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The brown algal genus Padina (Dictyotales, Phaeophyceae) is distributed worldwide in tropical and temperate seas. Global species diversity and distribution ranges, however, remain largely unknown. Species-level diversity was reassessed using DNA-based, algorithmic species delineation techniques based on cox3 and rbcL sequence data from 221 specimens collected worldwide. This resulted in estimates ranging from 39 to 61 putative species (ESUs), depending on the technique as well as the locus. We discuss the merits, potential pitfalls, and evolutionary and biogeographic significance of algorithmic species delineation. We unveil patterns whereby ESUs are in all but one case restricted to either the Atlantic or Indo-Pacific Ocean. Within ocean basins we find evidence for the vast majority of ESUs to be confined to a single marine realm. Exceptions, whereby ESUs span up to three realms, are located in the Indo-Pacific Ocean. Patterns of range-restricted species likely arise by repeated founder events and subsequent peripatric speciation, hypothesized to dominate speciation mechanisms for coastal marine organisms in the Indo-Pacific. Using a three-gene (cox3, psaA and rbcL), relaxed molecular clock phylogenetic analysis we estimated divergence times, providing a historical framework to interpret biogeographic patterns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据