4.5 Article

DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSES OF ANABAENA SP PCC 7120 (CYANOPHYCEAE) CULTURED IN NITROGEN-DEFICIENT AND NITROGEN-ENRICHED MEDIA TO ULTRAVIOLET-B RADIATION

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
卷 48, 期 3, 页码 615-625

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01162.x

关键词

Anabaena sp; PCC 7120; ATPase activity; compensatory growth; complementary chromatic acclimation; morphology; photosynthesis; ultraviolet B

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40971249]
  2. National Major Programs of Water Body Pollution Control and Remediation [2009ZX07106-001-003, 2009ZX07104-005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stratospheric ozone depletion increases the amount of ultraviolet-B radiation (UVBR) (280320 nm) reaching the surface of the earth, potentially affecting phytoplankton. In this work, Anabaena sp. PCC 7120, a typically nitrogen (N)-fixing filamentous bloom-forming cyanobacterium in freshwater, was individually cultured in N-deficient and N-enriched media for long-term acclimation before being subjected to ultraviolet-B (UVB) exposure experiments. Results suggested that the extent of breakage in the filaments induced by UVBR increases with increasing intensity of UVB stress. In general, except for the 0.1 W . m-2 treatment, which showed a mild increase, UVB exposure inhibits photosynthesis as evidenced by the decrease in the chl fluorescence parameters maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) and maximum relative electron transport rate. Complementary chromatic acclimation was also observed in Anabaena under different intensities of UVB stress. Increased total carbohydrate and soluble protein may provide some protection for the culture against damaging UVB exposure. In addition, N-deficient cultures with higher recovery capacity showed overcompensatory growth under low UVB (0.1 W . m-2) exposure during the recovery period. Significantly increased (similar to 830%) ATPase activity may provide enough energy to repair the damage caused by exposure to UVB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据