4.5 Article

DESICCATION STRESS CAUSES STRUCTURAL AND ULTRASTRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS IN THE AEROTERRESTRIAL GREEN ALGA KLEBSORMIDIUM CRENULATUM (KLEBSORMIDIOPHYCEAE, STREPTOPHYTA) ISOLATED FROM AN ALPINE SOIL CRUST

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 591-602

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2011.00980.x

关键词

actin microfilaments; cell wall; desiccation; DIOC6; FM 1-43; green algae; Streptophyta; ultrastructure

资金

  1. Alpine Research Center Obergurgl
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DEG) [KA899/16-1/2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Klebsormidium crenulatum (Kutz.) Lokhorst (Klebsormidiophyceae, Streptophyta) isolated from an alpine soil in Tyrol, Austria, was experimentally exposed to desiccation under various relative air humidities (RH 5, 75, and >95%, ambient air 55%-60%). The effects on the structure and ultrastructure of K crenulatum after 1, 4, or 7 d of desiccation at 5, 75, and >95% RH were investigated. The cross walls were deformed to an undulated shape, and the cell diameter was reduced to similar to 60% of the control. Regardless of the RH applied, in all cases the cytoplasm appeared denser compared to that of liquid-culture-grown cells. Electron-dense particles with diameters of 0.4 mu m-0.8 pm were observed in the cytoplasm, likely representing lipid droplets. The chloroplasts of desiccated samples contained a large number of plastoglobules. The number and appearance of mitochondria were not visibly altered, as also verified by 3,3' dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodine (DIOC6) staining. The amphi-philic styryl dye FM 1-43 resulted in staining of the plasma membrane in cells from liquid culture. In 7 d desiccated samples, a marked fluorescence is seen in similar to 40%-50% of the cells, which were dead. Actin microfilaments (MFs) were drastically disrupted after desiccation; only dotlike actin batches remained. These results demonstrate that flexibility of the cell walls and maintenance of the key organelles play a key role in the tolerance of desiccation stress in K crenulatum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据