4.5 Article

CHLOROPHYLL C PIGMENT PATTERNS IN 18 SPECIES (51 STRAINS) OF THE GENUS PSEUDO-NITZSCHIA (BACILLARIOPHYCEAE)

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
卷 47, 期 6, 页码 1274-1280

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2011.01055.x

关键词

chemotaxonomy; chl c pigments; diatoms; domoic acid-producing species; HABs; HPLC pigment analysis; Pseudo-nitzschia spp.

资金

  1. CYTMAR [MAR1995-1981-C04-0]
  2. Xunta de Galicia [PGDIT-CIMA-99/9, 10MMA40 2028PR]
  3. European Commission [GOCE-CT-2005-003875]
  4. IEO (CCVIEO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pigment composition of 18 species (51 strains) of the pennate diatom Pseudo-nitzschia was examined using HPLC. The carotenoid composition was typical for diatoms, with fucoxanthin (the major xanthophyll), diadinoxanthin, diatoxanthin, and beta,beta-carotene. However, a diverse array of chl c pigments was observed in the studied strains. All Pseudo-nitzschia strains contained chl a and chl c(2), traces of Mg-2,4-divinyl phaeoporphyrin a(5) mono-methyl ester (MgDVP), and traces of a chl c(2) like pigment originally found in the haptophyte Pavlova gyrans. The distribution of chl c(1) and chl c(3) was variable among species (present in seven and 14 species, respectively). Based on chl c distribution, three major pigment types were defined: type 1 (chl c(1) + c(2), four species: P. australis, P. brasiliana, P. multiseries, and P. seriata), type 2 (chl c(1) + c(2) + c(3), three species: P. fraudulenta, P. multistriata, and P. pungens), and type 3 (chl c(2) + c(3), 11 species: P. arenysensis, P. calliantha, P. cuspidata, P. decipiens, P. delicatissima, P. galaxiae, P. mannii, P. pseudodelicatissima, P. subcurvata, P. cf. subpacifica, and a novel Pseudo-nitzschia species). Type 1 and 2 species also shared the absence of a particular morphological character, the central nodule in the raphe, with the only exception of P. fraudulenta. The implications of such pigment diversity in chemotaxonomy, HAB monitoring, ecology, and phylogeny of Pseudonitzschia species are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据