4.5 Article

SURVEY FOR KARLOTOXIN PRODUCTION IN 15 SPECIES OF GYMNODINIOID DINOFLAGELLATES (KARENIACEAE, DINOPHYTA)

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 164-175

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00630.x

关键词

dinoflagellate; hemolytic; Kareniaceae; karlotoxin

资金

  1. Australian Research Council Discovery [DP0557820]
  2. Australian-American Fulbright Commission as the Inaugural Tasmanian Fulbright Scholar
  3. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coastal Ocean Program
  4. University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute [NA04NOS4780276]
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  6. Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
  7. Center of Marine Biotechnology [08-186]
  8. ECOHAB [275]
  9. [U50/CCU 323376]
  10. Australian Research Council [DP0557820] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Toxin analysis of 15 species of Kareniaceae revealed the presence of karlotoxin, KmTx 2, in only a single species (Karlodinium veneficum) but with variable activity in strains from the Swan (Km(Swan)Tx 2-1, 2.1 pg . cell(-1); and Km(Swan)Tx 2-2, 0.53 pg . cell(-1)), Huon (Km(Huon)Tx 2, 0.86 pg . cell(-1)), and Derwent rivers (< 0.001 pg . cell(-1)) in Australia. A newly isolated Southern Ocean species, Karlodinium conicum, contained a novel poorly hemolytic karlotoxin analogue (Km(conicum)Tx, 2.8 pg . cell(-1)). The hemolytic potency (HD50%) of the Australian karlotoxins were as follows: Km(Swan)Tx 2-1 (65.9 +/- 4.8 ng) and Km(Swan)Tx 2-2 (63.4 +/- 3.7 ng), Km(Huon)Tx 2 (343 +/- 4.9 ng), and Km(conicum)Tx (> 4,000 ng). Species from the closely related genera Takayama (T. helix, T. tasmanica, T. tuberculata), Karenia (K. asterichroma, K. brevis, K. mikimotoi, K. papilionacea, K. umbella), and Karlodinium (Ka. australe, Ka. antarcticum, Ka. ballantinum, Ka. corrugatum, Ka. decipiens) were all consistently negative for karlotoxin production. Brevetoxin (PbTx) was only detected in K. brevis, and hemolytic activity was only observed in Ka. veneficum strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据