4.6 Article

Antioxidant activity of various solvent extracts from Allomyrina dichotoma (Arthropoda: Insecta) larvae

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2010.02.005

关键词

Allomyrina dichotoma; Antioxidant; Electro spin resonance; Photoprotection; Singlet oxygen quenching

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [핵06B2302] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was under taken to evaluate the antioxidant properties of larvae extracts of Allomyrina dichotoma. The antioxidant activities of various larvae extracts of water, methanol, ethyl-acetate, chloroform, and hexane were measured by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), superoxide anion radical and singlet oxygen (O-1(2)). The methanolic larvae extracts displayed the greatest effect in DPPH radical scavenging assay, but the reducing activity of larvae extracts was weaker in the superoxide anion radical assay. However, methanol (ME) and chloroform extracts (CE) could be compared to ascorbic acid in O-1(2) quenching ability. ME (the concentration of 50% O-1(2) quenching, QC(50) = 0.080 mg/ml) and CE (QC(50) = 0.051 mg/ml) extracts had 1.7, 2.7 times better efficiency than ascorbic acid (QC(50) = 0.138 mg/ml), respectively. Also the extracts were found to protect biological systems in Escherichia coli and lactate dehydrogenase against detrimental effects of O-1(2) of type II photosensitization in vitro. The ability of larvae extracts to scavenge free radicals could significantly change contents of GA equivalent, an important factor for the potency of antioxidant capacity. The results suggest that our study may contribute to the development of new bioactive products with potential applications to reduce oxidative stress in living organisms involving reactive oxygen species as well as play a vital role in insect organisms against oxidative damage of undesirable conditions. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据