4.6 Article

Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of dyes by TiO2 nanobelts with hierarchical structures

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.01.015

关键词

TiO2 nanowires; Hierarchical structure; Surface adsorption; Photocatalytic degradation

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canadian Water Network Innovative Technologies for Water Treatment Program
  3. Canada Research Chairs Program
  4. Ontario Ministry of Research Innovation
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TiO2 nanobelt membranes with hierarchical structure were successfully synthesized by sequentially autoclaving Ti at 190 degrees C for 3 d in the presence of 10 M NaOH and 10 M KOH solutions. Microstructural characterization revealed TiO2 nanoparticles joining together and on the surface of nanobelts. These hierarchical structures form a three dimensional porous membrane which significantly enhances both surface specific area and light absorption, resulting in improved chemical adsorption capacity and photocatalytic degradation efficiency relative to nanobelts with smooth surfaces using methylene blue as a model molecule. The adsorption of methylene blue to these structures follows a pseudo-second order kinetics chemisorption mechanism with rate-limited diffusion correlated to pore structure and size. The dominant reactive oxygen species are identified as hydroxyl radicals and valence band holes through the scavenging reaction. The synergistic enhancement of filtration through surface adsorption and photocatalytic degradation is also demonstrated in a prototype photocatalytic membrane reactor with UV excitation at 365 nm. The reuse of nanobelt membranes after annealing shows the excellent recovery of TiO2 catalyst. These studies may contribute to additional applications of hierarchical TiO2 nanobelt membranes, including those harnessing sunlight for water treatment. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据