4.6 Article

Excited state intermolecular proton and energy transfer of 1-hydroxypyrene interacting with the human serum albumin protein

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.10.024

关键词

Excited state intermolecular proton transfer; 1-Hydroxypyrene; Energy transfer; Human serum albumin protein; Amino acid residue; Direct acid-base reaction

资金

  1. MICINN
  2. EU [MAT2008-01609, UNCM08-1E-068, UNCM08-1E-050]
  3. CYCLON Network [237962]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on pico to nanosecond studies of the excited-state intermolecular-proton transfer (ESPT) reaction and energy transfer of 1-hydroxypyrene (1-HP) with the human serum albumin (HSA) protein. The formed robust 1:1 complexes (K-eq = (1.84 +/- 0.1) x 10(6) M-1) show both photoacid and conjugated photo-base emissions of the caged 1-HP in its protonated structure. No evidence of excited state equilibrium between the protonated and deprotonated forms and of ESPT in aqueous phosphate buffer (pH 7) has been found. However, the proton-transfer reaction in the 1-HP/HSA protein complexes proceeds with a time constant of similar to 400 ps and is assigned to a direct acid-base reaction between 1-HP and carboxylate group of nearby amino acid residue of the HSA protein. Contrary to trisodium 8-hydroxypyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonate (HPTS) that has three electronegative sulfonate groups and forms strong H-bonds with amino acid residues in binding site II, 1-HP interacts predominantly with the hydrophobic pocket of binding site I. The ps-ns anisotropy measurements further confirm the robustness of HPTS:HSA complexes. We studied also the possible energy transfer process from excited tryptophan residue (Trp214) to the encapsulated 1-HP. For 1-HP:HSA complex, the efficiency of the energy transfer process from excited Trp214 to 1-HP is significant (77%) with a rate constant of similar to 9.8 x 10(8) s(-1) and calculated interchromophore distance of similar to 15 angstrom. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据