4.6 Article

Highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells based on nitrogen-doped titania with excellent stability

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.01.004

关键词

N-doped titania; Dye-sensitized solar cell; Electron transport; Photovoltaic performance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50773008]
  2. State Key Laboratory of New Ceramic and Fine Processing (Tsinghua University)
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program for Advanced Materials of China [2009AA03Z220]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT0711]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of nitrogen-doped and undoped TiO2 nanocrystals was prepared by several simple methods. Needle-like N-doped TiO2 nanocrystals and nanoparticles were obtained from commercial TiO2 powders. Several dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) were fabricated based on N-doped and undoped TiO2 electrodes. The N-doped DSCs achieved a high conversion efficiency of 10.1% and 4.8% using an organic electrolyte and an ionic liquid electrolyte, respectively. Systemic investigations were carried out on the properties of N-doped and undoped TiO2 powders, films, and DSCs. The electron transport time and electron lifetime were investigated by intensity-modulated photocurrent and photovoltage spectroscopy (IMPS/IMVS). Moreover, the electron injection of N-doped DSCs was studied by surface photovoltage spectroscopy (SPS). The synergetic effect of higher dye uptake, faster electron transport and higher photovoltage contributes to a higher conversion efficiency of N-doped DSCs. The stability test also demonstrated that the photodegradation of the DSCs was not accelerated and the DSC system was stabilized by the introduction of nitrogen into the TiO2 photoelectrode. These results indicate that the N-doped TiO2 nanocrystals prepared by our approach from commercial TiO2 are ideal semiconductor materials for DSCs. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据