4.6 Article

Bacterial inactivation kinetics, regrowth and synergistic competition in a photocatalytic disinfection system using anatase titanate nanofiber catalyst

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.05.018

关键词

TiO2; Nanofibers; Annular reactor; Photocatalysis; Bacterial inactivation; E. coli; Post-disinfection; Fenton reaction; Synergistic competition

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [LP0562153]
  2. Australian Water Quality Centre, SA Water Corporation through the Water Environmental Biotechnology Laboratory (WEBL) at the University of Adelaide
  3. Australian Research Council [LP0562153] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work studied the inactivation kinetics, bacterial regrowth and synergistic competition in the photocatalytic disinfection of a sewage isolated Escherichia coli (ATCC 11775) in an annular slurry photoreactor (ASP) system using anatase titanate nanofibers catalyst (TNC). The inactivation performance and disinfection kinetics of the TNC-ASP system were investigated with respect to operation conditions: INC loading, pH, aeration rate and inoculums size. At the optimum conditions, a 99.999% inactivation of 7 x 10(6) CFU mL(-1) E. coli was achieved in 60 min. The modified Horn model was used to perfectly-fit the sigmoid-shaped disinfection kinetic profile. The residual disinfecting effect was evaluated by postirradiation Fenton reaction. It was found that the 1.0 mg L-1 Fe2+ in conjunction with low chemical oxygen demand (COD) was able to initiate the post-photocatalytic Fenton reaction, where substantial bacterial regrowth was suppressed after 24 h treatment. Studies on the synergistic effect of COD concentration on the inactivation and the bacterial regrowth potential revealed that the E. coli could regrowth at a COD concentration over 16 mg L-1. Thus, significant removal of COD has to be ensured in a photocatalytic disinfection process to successfully maintain the biostability of the treated water. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据