4.6 Article

Synthesis, photophysics and photochemistry of tin(IV) phthalocyanine derivatives

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2008.06.007

关键词

tin phthalocyanine; fluorescence; triplet quantum yield; triplet lifetime; singlet oxygen quantum yield

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST)
  2. National Research Foundation (NRF), South Africa
  3. Rhodes University
  4. Medical Research Council of South Africa
  5. Andrew Mellon Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis, photophysical and photochemical properties of peripherally (beta) and non-peripherally (alpha) tetra-substituted aryloxy tin(IV) phthalocyanines are reported. The complexes presented are 1,(4)(tetraphenoxyphthalocyaninato) (7a); 2,(3)(tetraphenoxyphthalocyaninato) (8a), 1,(4)-(tetra tert-butylphenoxyphthalocyaninato) (7b); 2,(3)(tetra tert-butylphenoxyphthalocyaninato) (8b); 1,(4)-(tetra 4-benzyloxyphenoxyphthalocyaninato) (7c) and 2,(3)(tetra 4-benzyloxyphenoxyphthalocyaninato) (8c) tin([V). The trends in triplet, fluorescence, singlet oxygen and photoclegraclation quantum yields are described for these compounds. The complexes exhibited high triplet quantum yields (Phi(T)) ranging from 0.69 to 0.89 due to the spin-orbit coupling induced by Sn, which has a large atomic number, and this resulted in lowering of fluorescence quantum yields. The peripherally substituted derivatives (8a, 8b and 8c) showed marginally higher fluorescence quantum yield values ((Phi(F)=0.014, 0.010 and 0.011, respectively) compared to non-peripherally substituted derivatives (7a, 7b and 7c) which gave (Phi(F) = 0.008, 0.007 and 0.008, respectively). The singlet oxygen quantum yields ((Phi(Delta)) ranged from 0.58 to 0.75 indicating a potential use of these complexes as photosensitizers. Triplet lifetimes were generally low, ranging from 30 to 50 mu s. Photoreduction of the complexes in the absence of oxygen was observed during photolysis due to ring reduction. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据