4.7 Article

Nitrogen removal from wastewater by anaerobic methane-driven denitrification in a lab-scale reactor: heterotrophic denitrifiers associated with denitrifying methanotrophs

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 99, 期 24, 页码 10853-10860

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-015-6939-9

关键词

Biological nitrogen removal; Methane-driven denitrification; n-damo; Denitrifying methanotroph; Heterotrophic denitrification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51478415, 41276109]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015QNA6012]
  3. Key Science and Technology Innovation Team Project of Zhejiang Province [2013TD12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrite-dependent anaerobic methane oxidation (n-damo) is a newly discovered bioprocess that reduces nitrite to dinitrogen with methane as electron donor, which has promising potential to remove nitrogen from wastewater. In this work, a lab-scale sequencing batch reactor (SBR) was operated for 609 days with methane as the sole external electron donor. In the SBR, nitrite in synthetic wastewater was removed continuously; the final volumetric nitrogen removal rate was 12.22 +/- 0.02 mg N L-1 day(-1) and the percentage of nitrogen removal was 98.5 +/- A 0.2 %. Microbial community analysis indicated that denitrifying methanotrophs dominated (60-70 %) the population of the final sludge. Notably, activity testing and microbial analysis both suggested that heterotrophic denitrifiers existed in the reactor throughout the operation period. After 609 days, the activity testing indicated the nitrogen removal percentage of heterotrophic denitrification was 17 +/- A 2 % and that of n-damo was 83 +/- A 2 %. A possible mutualism may be developed between the dominated denitrifying methanotrophs and the associated heterotrophs through cross-feed. Heterotrophs may live on the microbial products excreted by denitrifying methanotrophs and provide growth factors that are required by denitrifying methanotrophs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据