4.3 Article

A Novel Fluoride Anion Modified Gelatin Nanogel System for Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Release

期刊

出版社

CANADIAN SOC PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.18433/J3988J

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [30772658, 30570494]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. We prepared a novel fluoride anion-modified gelatin nanogel system and investigate its pattern of ultrasound-triggered drug release. Methods. Adriamycin (ADM) gelatin nanogel modified with fluoride anion (ADM-GNMF) was prepared by a modified co-precipitation method with fluoride anion and sodium sulfate. The loading and encapsulation efficiency of ADM were measured by HPLC. The size and shape of ADM-GNMF were determined by electron microscopy and photo-correlation spectroscopy. The diameter distribution changes and drug release efficiencies of ADM-GNMF, before and after sonication, were measured by a submicron particle size analyzer, an ultrasound generator, an ultrasound generator and an automatic sampler. Results. The ADM-GNMF was stable in solution with an average diameter of 46 +/- 12 nm; the encapsulation and loading efficiency of adriamycin were 87.2% and 6.38%, respectively. The ultrasound-triggered drug release and size change were most efficient at a frequency of 20 kHz, power density of 0.4w/cm(2), and a 1 similar to 2 min duration. Under this ultrasound-triggered condition, 51.5% of drug in ADM-GNMF was released within 1 similar to 2 min, while the size of ADM-GNMF changed from 46 +/- 12 nin to 1212 +/- 35 nin within 1 similar to 2 min of sonication and restored to its previous size in 2 similar to 3 min after the ultrasound stopped. In contrast, 8.2% of drug in ADM-GNMF was released within 2 similar to 3 min without sonication, and only negligible size changes were found. Conclusions. The ADM-GNMF system efficiently released the encompassed drug in response to ultrasound, offering a novel and promising controlled drug release system for targeted therapy for cancer or other diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据