4.5 Article

Combination therapy with fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α agonist, and simvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme a reductase inhibitor, on experimental traumatic brain injury

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.108.140368

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We and others have demonstrated that fibrates [peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)alpha agonists] and statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) exerted neuroprotective and pleiotropic effects in experimental models of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Because the combination of statins and fibrates synergistically enhanced PPAR alpha activation, we hypothesized that the combination of both drugs may exert more important and/or prolonged beneficial effects in TBI than each alone. In this study, we examined the combination of fenofibrate with simvastatin, administered 1 and 6 h after injury, on the consequences of TBI. First, our dose-effect study demonstrated that the most efficient dose of simvastatin (37.5 mg/kg) reduced post-traumatic neurological deficits and brain edema. Then, the effects of the combination of fenofibrate (50 mg/kg) and simvastatin (37.5 mg/kg), given p. o. at 1 and 6 h after TBI, were evaluated on the TBI consequences in the early and late phase after injury. The combination exerted more sustained neurological recovery-promoting and antiedematous effects than monotherapies, and it synergistically decreased the post-traumatic brain lesion. Furthermore, a delayed treatment given p. o. at 3 and 8 h after TBI with the combination was still efficient on neurological deficits induced by TBI, but it failed to reduce the brain edema at 48 h. The present data represent the first demonstration that the combination of fenofibrate and simvastatin exerts prolonged and synergistic neuroprotective effects than each drug alone. Thus, these results may have important therapeutic significance for the treatment of TBI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据