4.5 Article

5-hydroxytryptamine lowers blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive rats

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.108.136226

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL81115] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arterial hyper-responsiveness to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) is a hallmark of hypertension, and plasma levels of free 5-HT are elevated in hypertension. We hypothesized that chronic administration of 5-HT would cause blood pressure to 1) rise in normotensive rats and 2) rise significantly more in hypertensive rats. The deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)-salt hypertensive and sham normotensive rat were used. Animals were implanted with minipumps that delivered 5-HT (or vehicle) at a rate of 25 mu g/kg/min for 7 days. Free plasma 5-HT was elevated significantly by this protocol. Within 48 h, mean arterial blood pressure measured telemetrically decreased in sham (106 +/- 2 to 83 +/- 2 mm Hg) and in DOCA-salt hypertensive (166 +/- 9 to 112 +/- 3 mm Hg) rats; vehicle did not change blood pressure in either group. Ganglionic blockade (hexamethonium) reduced blood pressure to a greater magnitude in DOCA vehicle-administered rats (peak fall arterial pressure, 91 +/- 14 mm Hg) compared with DOCA 5-HT-administered rats (40 +/- 6 mm Hg). Maximal acetylcholine-induced (NO-dependent) relaxation in phenylephrine-contracted aortic strips was greater in 5-HT-administered (69.2 +/- 9.1% relaxation) versus vehicle-administered (39.7 +/- 14.2%) DOCA rats; aortic endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase expression was higher in the 5-HT-versus vehicle-administered DOCA-salt rats. In normotensive and DOCA-salt hypertensive rats, the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor N-omega-nitro-L-arginine (0.5 g/l in water) prevented the fall in blood pressure to 5-HT. We conclude that chronic exogenous 5-HT reduces blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive rats through mechanisms critically dependent on NOS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据