4.5 Article

14-3-3 Protein Protects Against Cardiac Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress (ERS) and ERS-Initiated Apoptosis in Experimental Diabetes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 113, 期 4, 页码 325-334

出版社

JAPANESE PHARMACOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1254/jphs.10047FP

关键词

14-3-3 protein; diabetes mellitus; endoplasmic reticulum stress; apoptosis; glucose-regulated protein (GRP) 78

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetic cardiomyopathy and nephropathy induce endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) and ERS-initiated apoptosis. The primary function of 14-3-3 protein is to inhibit apoptosis, but the roles of this protein in protecting against cardiac ERS and apoptosis in the diabetic heart are largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the in vivo role of 14-3-3 protein in diabetic ERS and apoptosis using streptozotocin (STZ)-induced transgenic mice that showed cardiac-specific expression of a dominant negative (DN) 14-3-3 eta protein mutant. The expression levels of cardiac glucose-regulated protein (GRP) 78, inositol-requiring enzyme (Ire) 1 alpha, and tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factor (TRAF) 2 protein were significantly increased in the diabetic DN 14-3-3 eta mice compared with the diabetic wild-type. Moreover, cardiac apoptosis and the expression of CCAAT / enhancer binding protein homology protein (CHOP), caspase-12, and cleaved caspase-12 protein were significantly increased in the diabetic DN 14-3-3 eta mice. In conclusion, partial depletion of 14-3-3 protein in the diabetic heart exacerbates cardiac ERS and activates ERS-induced apoptosis pathways, at least in part, through the regulation of CHOP and caspase-12 via the Ire1 alpha/TRAF2 pathway. The enhancement of 14-3-3 protein expression can be used as a novel protective therapy against ERS and ERS-initiated apoptosis in the diabetic heart.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据