4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Systemic glucocorticoid therapy reduces pain and the number of endoneurial tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα)-positive mast cells in rats with a painful peripheral neuropathy

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 106, 期 4, 页码 559-565

出版社

JAPANESE PHARMACOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1254/jphs.FP0072181

关键词

glucocorticoid; hyperalgesia; mast cell; neuropathic pain; tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha)

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01-NS36834] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical and experimental evidence suggests that glucocorticoids may be effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain, but their mechanism of action is unknown. We gave triamcinolone (3 mg/kg) to rats with an experimental post-traumatic painful peripheral neuropathy, chronic constriction injury (CCI), five days after nerve injury, when the abnormal pain syndrome is known to be present; and pain sensitivity was measured on postoperative days 7 - 14, a period during which symptoms are known to be at approximately peak severity. Additional CCI rats were treated similarly; and then they were sacrificed five days after the injection for an immunocytochemical analysis of endoneurial tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha), macrophages, and mast cells in the sciatic nerve proximal to the site of injury. Vehicle-injected CCI rats demonstrated the expected neuropathic pain symptoms. Triamcinolone-treated CCI rats had a statistically significant reduction in the magnitude of heat-hyperalgesia and mechano-allodynia, but there was no effect on cold-allodynia or mechano-hyperalgesia. On the nerve-injured side of vehicle-injected rats, TNFa was present in Schwann cells and mast cells. On the nerve-injured side of triamcinolone-treated rats, there was a significant (71.5%) reduction in the number of TNF alpha-positive mast cells. Our results suggest that glucocorticoid therapy for neuropathic pain may work via the reduced expression of TNF alpha in endoneurial mast cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据