4.5 Article

Stability of Monoclonal Antibodies at High-Concentration: Head-to-Head Comparison of the IgG1 and IgG4 Subclass

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 103, 期 1, 页码 115-127

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.23788

关键词

monoclonal antibody; protein formulation; protein aggregation; chemical stability; protein-protein interactions; high concentration; thermal analysis; physical stability

资金

  1. Novo Nordisk A/S
  2. Drug Research Academy (DRA) at the University of Copenhagen
  3. Apotekerfonden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Few studies have so far directly compared the impact of antibody subclass on protein stability. This case study investigates two mAbs (one IgG(1) and one IgG(4)) with identical variable region. Investigations of mAbs that recognize similar epitopes are necessary to identify possible differences between the IgG subclasses. Both physical and chemical stability were evaluated by applying a range of methods to measure formation of protein aggregates [size-exclusion chromatography (SEC)-HPLC and UV340 nm], structural integrity (circular dichroism and FTIR), thermodynamic stability (differential scanning calorimetry), colloidal interactions (dynamic light scattering), and fragmentation and deamidation (SEC-HPLC and capillary isoelectric focusing). The impact of pH (4-9) and ionic strength (10 and 150 mM) was investigated using highly-concentrated (150 mg/mL) mAb formulations. Lower conformational stability was identified for the IgG(4) resulting in increased levels of soluble aggregates. The IgG(1) was chemically less stable as compared with the IgG(4), presumably because of the higher flexibility in the IgG(1) hinge region. The thermodynamic stability of individual mAb domains was also addressed in detail. The stability of our mAb molecules is clearly affected by the IgG framework, and this study suggests that subclass switching may alter aggregation propensity and aggregation pathway and thus potentially improve the overall formulation stability while retaining antigen specificity. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 103:115-127, 2014

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据