4.5 Article

Improving Monoclonal Antibody Selection and Engineering using Measurements of Colloidal Protein Interactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 103, 期 11, 页码 3356-3363

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jps.24130

关键词

high throughput technologies; biophysical methods; solubility; protein aggregation; protein formulation; physical stability; viscosity; IgG; V-H; V-L; Fab; CDR; complementarity-determining region

资金

  1. NSF (CBET) [0954450, 1159943]
  2. NIH [R01GM104130]
  3. MedImmune
  4. Eli Lilly
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  6. Janssen Biotech
  7. Merck
  8. Genentech
  9. Amgen
  10. Pfizer
  11. Adimab
  12. Abbott
  13. Bayer
  14. Roche
  15. DuPont
  16. Directorate For Engineering
  17. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0954450] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  18. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  19. Directorate For Engineering [1159943] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A limitation of using mAbs as therapeutic molecules is their propensity to associate with themselves and/or with other molecules via nonaffinity (colloidal) interactions. This can lead to a variety of problems ranging from low solubility and high viscosity to off-target binding and fast antibody clearance. Measuring such colloidal interactions is challenging given that they are weak and potentially involve diverse target molecules. Nevertheless, assessing these weak interactionsespecially during early antibody discovery and lead candidate optimizationis critical to preventing problems that can arise later in the development process. Here we review advances in developing and implementing sensitive methods for measuring antibody colloidal interactions as well as using these measurements for guiding antibody selection and engineering. These systematic efforts to minimize nonaffinity interactions are expected to yield more effective and stable mAbs for diverse therapeutic applications. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 103:3356-3363, 2014

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据