4.5 Article

Physical Stability Comparisons of IgG1-Fc Variants: Effects of N-Glycosylation Site Occupancy and Asp/Gln Residues at Site Asn 297

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 103, 期 6, 页码 1613-1627

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.23975

关键词

conformation; stability; glycosylation; IgG; monoclonal antibody; Fc; formulation; mass spectrometry; spectroscopy

资金

  1. NIH [NIGMS RO1 GM090080, 5-T32-GM008359, P20RRl7708]
  2. King Saud University
  3. [HRSAC76HF16266]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structural integrity and conformational stability of various IgG1-Fc proteins produced from the yeast Pichia pastoris with different glycosylation site occupancy (di-, mono-, and nonglycosylated) were determined. In addition, the physical stability profiles of three different forms of nonglycosylated Fc molecules (varying amino-acid residues at site 297 in the C(H)2 domain due to the point mutations and enzymatic digestion of the Fc glycoforms) were also examined. The physical stability of these IgG1-Fc glycoproteins was examined as a function of pH and temperature by high-throughput biophysical analysis using multiple techniques combined with data visualization tools (three index empirical phase diagrams and radar charts). Across the pH range of 4.0-6.0, the di- and monoglycosylated forms of the IgG1-Fc showed the highest and lowest levels of physical stability, respectively, with the nonglycosylated forms showing intermediate stability depending on solution pH. In the aglycosylated Fc proteins, the introduction of Asp (D) residues at site 297 (QQ vs. DN vs. DD forms) resulted in more subtle changes in structural integrity and physical stability depending on solution pH. The utility of evaluating the conformational stability profile differences between the various IgG1-Fc glycoproteins is discussed in the context of analytical comparability studies. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据