4.5 Article

Effects of Particle Size, Food, and Capsule Shell Composition on the Oral Bioavailability of Dabrafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, in Patients with BRAF Mutation-Positive Tumors

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 102, 期 9, 页码 3100-3109

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.23519

关键词

dabrafenib; food effects; particle size; bioavailability; HPMC; gelatin; capsules; supersaturation; dissolution; clinical pharmacokinetics

资金

  1. GlaxoSmithKline [NCT01231568]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dabrafenib is a small-molecule inhibitor of BRAF kinase activity that is currently being developed for the treatment of BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma. This clinical, open-label, two-cohort (n = 14 per cohort), randomized study was designed to evaluate the effect of drug substance particle size, and food on the plasma pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of dabrafenib in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive solid tumors. In addition, an exploratory cross-cohort comparison of the relative bioavailability of single-dose dabrafenib administered in gelatin and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) capsules was performed. Higher bioavailabilitywas notedwith nonmicronized drug substance (larger particle size), under fasting conditions, and with HPMC capsules. Initial dissolution results at pH 1.2 showed higher dissolution of gelatin relative to HPMC capsules inconsistent with clinical data. Subsequent in vitro dissolution studies were conducted in fasted-state simulated gastric fluid over a 24-h period and showed that HPMC capsules reached a higher percentage of dabrafenib dissolved than gelatin capsules. The presence of HPMC is believed to inhibit precipitation of dabrafenib as the freebase, thereby maintaining a supersaturated solution over an extended period of time. Dabrafenib has been administered in pivotal clinical studies on an empty stomach using micronized drug substance in HPMC capsules. (C) 2013Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据