4.5 Article

Synthesis, characterization, and liposome partition of a novel tetracycline derivative using the ionic liquids framework

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 102, 期 5, 页码 1504-1512

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.23487

关键词

Tetracycline; Docusate; Ionic Liquids; Synthesis; Drug-like properties; Solubility; Partition Coefficient; Liposomes; UV-VIS spectroscopy

资金

  1. FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [PTDC/EQU-EPR/104554/2008]
  2. FCT [SFRH/BD/73761/2010, SFRH/BPD/38637/2007]
  3. Ciencia Program
  4. FEDER
  5. FCT/MCTES
  6. [REDE/1517/RMN/2005]
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/EQU-EPR/104554/2008, SFRH/BD/73761/2010, SFRH/BPD/38637/2007] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, efforts have been put on the development of new drug formulations using ionic liquid framework. In this work, two different species of abroad-spectrum polyketide antibiotic, tetracycline, are studied in terms of some important properties for antibiotics such as solubility in water and hydrophilichydrophobic balance. Tetracycline was used as cation, whereas docusate, a biocompatible anion, which enables the tailoring of the hydrophilicity of salts, was chosen as the anion. The developed innovative ion pair, tetracycline docusate, was characterized in terms of its thermal stability, water solubility, octanolwater, and liposomewater partition coefficients, using UVvis spectrophotometry because of the absorbance of tetracycline around 270nm. Egg yolk phosphatidylcholine liposomes were used as cell membrane models, and the interactions of both tetracycline hydrochloride and tetracycline docusate with the liposomes were quantified by determination of the partition coefficient using derivative spectrophotometry. A theoretical model based on simple partition drugs between two different media was used to determine the partition coefficient in liposomes. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 102:15041512, 2013

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据