4.5 Article

Formation of reactive impurities in aqueous and neat polyethylene glycol 400 and effects of antioxidants and oxidation inducers

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 101, 期 9, 页码 3305-3318

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jps.23198

关键词

excipients; reactive impurities; oxidation; antioxidants; PEG; formaldehyde; formic acid; stability; analysis; formulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) precolumn derivatization high-performance liquid chromatographyultraviolet detection (HPLCUV) method was developed to quantify levels of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions. Formic acid and acetic acid were quantified by HPLCUV. Samples of neat and aqueous PEG 400 solutions were monitored at 40 degrees C and 50 degrees C to determine effects of excipient source, water content, pH, and trace levels of hydrogen peroxide or iron metal on the formation of reactive impurities. The effects of antioxidants were also evaluated. Formic acid was the major degradation product in nearly all cases. The presence of water increased the rate of formation of all impurities, especially formic acid as did the presence of hydrogen peroxide and trace metals. Acidic pH increased the formation of acetaldehyde and acetic acid. A distribution of unidentified degradation products formed in neat PEG 400 disappeared upon addition of HCl with corresponding increase of formic acid, indicating they were likely to be PEG-formyl esters. Other unidentified degradation products reacted with DNPH to form a distribution of derivatized products likely to be PEG aldehydes. Antioxidants butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene, propyl gallate d-alpha tocopheryl polyethylene glycol-1000 succinate, and sodium metabisulfite were effective in limiting reactive impurity formation, whereas ascorbic acid and acetic acid were not. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 101:33053318, 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据