4.5 Article

Poloxamer/Cyclodextrin/Chitosan-Based Thermoreversible Gel for Intranasal Delivery of Fexofenadine Hydrochloride

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 100, 期 2, 页码 681-691

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.22314

关键词

nasal drug delivery; fexofenadine hydrochloride; thermoreversibility; poloxamer 407; bioavailability; polymeric drug carrier; absorption enhancer; gels

资金

  1. Korean government (MEST) [2009-0083533]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To enhance permeation and solubility of an intranasal delivery system of fexofenadine hydrochloride (FXD HCl), a new formulation using poloxamer 407 (P407)/hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin (HP-beta-CD)-based thermoreversible gels with chitosan, was developed. Prepared gels were characterized by gelation temperature, viscosity, viscoelasticity, and drug release profile. The in vitro permeation study was performed in primary human nasal epithelial cell monolayers cultured by air liquid interface method. The addition of chitosan caused the slight elevation of gelation temperature and viscosity-enhancing effect. Viscosity enhancement by the incorporation of chitosan caused the retardation of drug release from P407 gels in in vitro release test. The in vitro permeation profile showed that the increase in chitosan content (0.1% and 0.3%, w/v) significantly enhanced the permeation of FXD HCl. After intranasal administration of P407/HP-beta-CD-based thermoreversible gels containing 0.1% and 0.3% of chitosan in rabbits at 0.5 mg/kg dose, plasma concentrations of FXD HCl were significantly higher than those of nasal solutions (p < 0.05). In particular, the bioavailability of the optimized thermoreversible gel containing 0.3% chitosan was about 18-fold higher than that of the solution type. These results suggested the feasibility that thermosensitive gels could be used as an effective dosage form to enhance the nasal absorption of FXD HCl. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 100:681-691, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据