4.5 Article

Production of pH-Responsive Microparticles by Spray Drying: Investigation of Experimental Parameter Effects on Morphological and Release Properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 100, 期 2, 页码 566-579

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.22291

关键词

spray drying; Eudragit L100; microparticles; burst release; encapsulation; polymeric drug delivery systems; controlled release

资金

  1. Stiefel laboratories Ltd, a GSK company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During spray drying, emphasis is placed on process optimisation to generate favourable particle morphological and flow properties. The effect of the initial feed solution composition on the drug release from the prepared microparticles (MPs) is rarely considered. We investigated the effects of solvent composition, feed solution concentration and drug-loading on sodium salicylate, hydrocortisone and triamcinolone release from spray-dried Eudragit L100 MPs. Eudragit L100 is a pH-responsive polymer whose dissolution threshold is pH 6 so dissolution testing of the prepared MPs at pH 5 and 1.2 illustrated non-polymer controlled burst release. Increasing the water content of the initial ethanolic feed solution significantly reduced hydrocortisone burst release at pH 5, as did reducing the feed solution concentration. These findings caution that changes in feed solution concentration or solvent composition not only affect particles' morphological characteristics but can also negatively alter their drug release properties. This work also illustrate that drug-free MPs can have different morphological properties to drug-loaded MPs. Therefore, process optimisation needs to be carried out using drug-loaded systems. Depending on the physicochemical properties of the encapsulated active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), drug-loading can affect the polymer solubility in the initial feed solution with consequent impact on MPs morphological and release properties. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 100:566-579, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据