4.5 Article

Blood-Brain Barrier Transport of Naloxone Does Not Involve P-glycoprotein-Mediated Efflux

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 99, 期 1, 页码 413-421

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.21819

关键词

naloxone; blood-brain barrier; P-glycoprotein; transport

资金

  1. High-Tech Research Center
  2. Academic Frontier
  3. MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) in Japan
  4. Nihon University General Individual Research [07-111]
  5. A Joint Research Grant from Nihon University College of Pharmacy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) transport of naloxone, a potent and specific opioid antagonist, was investigated in rats using the brain uptake index method and the brain efflux index method. The apparent influx clearance of [(3)H]naloxone across the BBB was 0.305 mL/min/g brain. [(3)H]naloxone was eliminated from the brain with an apparent elimination half-life of 15.1 min after microinjection into the parietal cortex area 2 regions of the rat brain. The apparent efflux clearance of [(3)H]naloxone across the BBB was 0.152 mL/min/g brain, which was calculated from the elimination rate constant (4.79 x 10(-2) min(-1)) and the distribution volume in the brain (3.18 mL/g brain). The influx clearance across the BBB was two times greater than the efflux clearance. The elimination of [(3)H]naloxone from the brain was not inhibited in the presence of the typical P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors such as quinidine, verapamil, vinblastine, and vincristine, indicating that naloxone is not a P-gp substrate in the rat. In vitro experiments by using human multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1)/P-gp overexpressing HeLa cells showed that the uptake of naloxone by the cells did not change in the presence of the P-gp inhibitors. In conclusion, the present results obtained from in, vivo and in vitro studies suggest that P-gp is not involved in the BBB transport of naloxone. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 99:413-421, 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据