4.5 Article

Methodology for Development of a Physiological Model Incorporating CYP3A and P-Glycoprotein for the Prediction of Intestinal Drug Absorption

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 98, 期 6, 页码 2180-2197

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.21572

关键词

physiologically based pharmacokinetics; CYP3A4; P-glycoprotein; Intestinal absorption; pharmacokinetics

资金

  1. GlaxoSmithKline
  2. Eli Lilly
  3. Novartis
  4. Pfizer
  5. Servier

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The small intestine poses a major barrier to the efficient absorption of orally administered therapeutics. Intestinal epithelial cells are an extremely important site for extrahepatic clearance, primarily due to prominent P-glycoprotein-mediated active efflux and the presence of cytochrome P450s. We describe a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model which incorporates geometric variations, pH alterations and descriptions of the abundance and distribution of cytochrome 3A and P-glycoprotein along the length of the small intestine. Simulations using preclinical in vitro data for model drugs were performed to establish the influence of P-glycoprotein efflux, cytochrome 3A metabolism and passive permeability on drug available for absorption within the enterocytes. The fraction of drug escaping the enterocyte (F-G) for 10 cytochrome 3A substrates with a range of intrinsic metabolic clearances were simulated. Following incorporation of P-glycoprotein in vitro efflux ratios all predicted F-G values were within 20% of observed in vivo F-G. The presence of P-glycoprotein increased the level of cytochrome 3A drug metabolism by up to 12-fold in the distal intestine. F-G was highly sensitive to changes in intrinsic metabolic clearance but less sensitive to changes in intestinal drug permeability. The model will be valuable for quantifying aspects of intestinal drug absorption and distribution. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 98:2180-2197, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据