4.6 Article

Intrarenal metabolomics reveals the association of local organic toxins with the progression of diabetic kidney disease

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.11.010

关键词

Diabetic kidney disease; Metabolomic; Organic toxins; Uremic toxin; Fosinopril

资金

  1. National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [30973911, 81001488, 30801539]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20100480236]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pathological development of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) might involve metabolic perturbations in kidney tissue. The present study was designed to detect the systematic alterations of renal cortex metabolites thereby exploring the related mechanisms of DKD development and fosinopril treatment. Based on combined gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF MS) and liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-TOF MS) data acquiring platform, we have performed a metabolomic analysis of perfused renal cortex samples from the diabetic rats induced by streptozocin and treated with or without fosinopril, a pharmacological inhibitor of angiotensin II converting enzyme (ACEI). We identified a number of abnormal metabolites in the diabetic kidney, including groups of amino acids, carbohydrates, polyols, lyso-phospholipids, glucuronides and other unidentified metabolites. Of them, an increase in intrarenal organic toxins including uremic toxins, glucuronides and glucotocixity-associated metabolites are highly correlated with diabetic kidney injury including 24 h urinary protein levels and tubulointerstitial injury index. Treatment with fosinopril significantly attenuated diabetic kidney injury, and simultaneously blocked the intrarenal accumulation of these organic toxins, especially hippurate and glucuronides. These results indicate that intrarenal accumulation of organic toxins may be significant for the development of DKD and the related mechanisms deserve to be further investigated. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据