4.7 Review

16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing data mining of microbial diversity and interactions

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 99, 期 10, 页码 4119-4129

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-015-6536-y

关键词

Next-generation sequencing; 16S rRNA gene; Bioinformatics and statistics; Network analysis; Microbiology; Biotechnology

资金

  1. Hong Kong General Research Fund [7195/06E, 7197/08E, 7202/09E, 7198/10E, 7201/11E, 7190/12E, 172099/14E]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ubiquitous occurrence of microorganisms gives rise to continuous public concerns regarding their pathogenicity and threats to human environment, as well as potential engineering benefits in biotechnology. The development and wide application of environmental biotechnology, for example in bioenergy production, wastewater treatment, bioremediation, and drinking water disinfection, have been bringing us with both environmental and economic benefits. Strikingly, extensive applications of microscopic and molecular techniques since 1990s have allowed engineers to peep into the microbiology in black box of engineered microbial communities in biotechnological processes, providing guidelines for process design and optimization. Recently, revolutionary advances in DNA sequencing technologies and rapidly decreasing costs are altering conventional ways of microbiology and ecology research, as it launches an era of next-generation sequencing (NGS). The principal research burdens are now transforming from traditional labor-intensive wet-lab experiments to dealing with analysis of huge and informative NGS data, which is computationally expensive and bioinformatically challenging. This study discusses state-of-the-art bioinformatics and statistical analyses of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene high-throughput sequencing (HTS) data from prevalent NGS platforms to promote its applications in exploring microbial diversity of functional and pathogenic microorganisms, as well as their interactions in biotechnological processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据